It pays to keep fighting. Canadian software developer I4i demonstrated 290 million good reasons to keep fighting last week by sticking to their guns despite Microsoft’s full court press to invalidate the I4i patent. Microsoft was essentially arguing for a change in the standard for invalidating patents by asking the court to use the lower standard of preponderance of the evidence (aka the “51% rule”) from the statutory clear and convincing standard.
The Court didn’t buy Microsoft’s argument, which was supported heavily by briefs from the software industry including such giants as Cisco, Apple, and other amici filers. This case was started in 2007, proceeded through the trial...
Stanford Loses Big To Roche in HIV Patent Dispute
The best way to learn is from other’s mistakes. So, if you are a corporate entity that engages in product development or a university looking to capitalize on your researcher’s ingenuity LISTEN UP. Stanford learned a valuable (and yes, costly) lesson this week at the hands of the Supreme Court. While this wasn’t a real surprise to those of us watching the case there is a good take away here: assignment wording matters. Make sure, make DARN SURE, you get an agreement from every potential inventor in your organization that they actually assign, not just agree to assign, all developed intellectual property to the company (or university). And monitor your inventors to ensure that they do not execute any contradictory...